The History Of Descartes Dream Argument

The History Of Descartes Dream ArgumentIn this paper, I allow be discussing Descartes dream personal line of credit for which I will try to find reliable signs between being asleep and conjure up. When looking at Descartes subscriber line I find it to be a valid argument due to its premises and structure. I will explain his argument, prove that it is factually sound and valid, and then discuss arguments against his argument and then refute them.Descartes attempts to find go forth what true knowledge was by finding everything or sothing that was indubitable. His thought was to take the indubitable belief and build his knowledge and beliefs based on the indubitable belief. His dream argument was one of the ways he attempted to strengthen his theory. His dream argument states the idea that one cannot trust your senses when awake, because your theme is capable producing false images duration aspiration. If the mind can produce false images while we ar asleep dreaming, couldnt your mind also create false images while you argon awake? If you cant full trust what you spend a penny seen while asleep, how can you rely on what you see when awake? Descartes dream argument states that you can often have perceptions very ofttimes like the ones while dreaming. There are no definite signs to determine dreaming experience from a waking experience. Therefore, It is possible that I am dreaming redress now and all knowledge I find while dreaming is false. In other terms, Descartes first premise states that when asleep or awake, the aforesaid(prenominal) type of perception and senses are found feel the same way no matter which state you are in. His second premise states that thither are no reliable ways to determine if you are dreaming or not that would be able to work every time. With these two premises, Descartes finds that while you are asleep, you could be feeling similar things to what you might feel while awake. You cant tell if you are dreaming or awake at some(prenominal) given(p) time, which means you could be dreaming and everything which you would sense or feel would be based on false and untrue findings. This statement leads you to question whether at any given time are you awake or dreaming, or are you in a constant state of dreaming and anything knowledge you gained during your constant dreaming state, is true or not? This argument backs what Descartes is attempt to prove, what real knowledge is, and that knowledge we find to be true could still be false, because of the state in which we received the knowledge. We cannot simply accept this argument without attempting to find ways to disprove it.If we pretend that the feelings we have while we are asleep are like the feelings we have when we are awake, and if we cant tell if we are dreaming or not, the only conclusion you can make from this is that it is entirely possible to be dreaming at this minute and all of our feelings are based on factitious things. We wouldnt be able to tell the difference between a dreaming state and an awake state, because they both(prenominal) feel the same to us. When are dreaming you can possibly feel everything you would while being awake. This concludes that there is no way to know if you are curled up in your bed dreaming, or out in the real globe awake. I believe that the first premise is true because everyone including myself has had a moment in a dream in which they matte like was reality. As long as you have had at least one dwarfish tiny moment in which you thought a dream was a reality, the premise holds. It doesnt require all of our dreams to be this way, it requires just one small moment to put the doubt in your mind, if it happened once couldnt it be happening right now.A counter argument we will look at tries to go against what Descartes was trying to prove through his dream argument, which is can you cast doubt on knowledge that we would otherwise deem truthful. The ideas in your dreams are based off of th ings or experiences you have had or felt in real life, which would mean you could trust what you felt in your dreams, because it is based off of the real world. In the real world you can come across a picture of a unicorn which we know doesnt exist. A unicorn is merely a horse with a horn on its head, both things which exist in the real world, and even though the picture is factitious it comes from experiences in the real world. Which would mean anything we dream up would come from things we have already seen in real live. A way to disprove this argument would be modern video games. For example the video game Skyrim which has you running around in a factitious world hunting down dragons. Dragons are a completely fictional creature which leads us to show that someone at some point dreamt up the creature of a scaled, flying, fire breathing beast. Whom ever dreamt up the fictional character of a dragon would have done so without any previous experience of what characteristics a dragon would possess. Which in turn leads us to believe people can make things up without ever having a dragon like creature imprinted in his mind before dreaming it up.Descartes argument was found to be both sound and valid. We can conclude that at any given time we cannot determine if we are dreaming or not. I believe Descartes was right with his findings. I do not believe that there are any valid signs to determine whether you are awake or asleep. Granted you may be able to argue that the pain you felt while you where awake such as getting punched in the face could only happen while you were awake that there was no way that you could be dreaming. besides you can always go back to that one dream or moment when you were in an sleeping state and you felt a pain that felt so real you could have sworn you werent dreaming. All it takes for Descartes argument to work is for you to be able to think of that one moment in which a realm of your dream felt so real that you could have sworn it rea lly happened. This goes to show if it happens once even for a split second, it could be happening right now and you would never know it.